Problem: Developers routinely need to capture, inspect, retry, and share webhooks, but existing tools are either single‑user, ephemeral, or have clunky UX. Source signal: Multiple Reddit threads ask for RequestBin/webhook.site alternatives and free/self‑hosted options, indicating broad demand. Solution (web + optional self-hosted): Team namespaces with persistent bins, JSON schema validation, signature verification helpers (Stripe, Shopify, Svix), replays with header/body edits, diffing across attempts, and shareable repro links for vendors. Extras: Ngrok-less inbound via static subdomain, redaction rules, and PII scrub. Differentiation: Multi-user collaboration, CI integration to auto-record fixtures for tests, and source connectors to simulate webhooks from GitHub, Slack, Twilio. Competitor validation: RequestBin, webhook.site, Svix (deliveries) show paid market; collaboration layer is underserved. Pricing hypothesis: Free personal; $12/user/mo team; $199/mo self-hosted. Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/ne2a2q/any_self_hosted_version_for_requestbin_or/
Platform: web
| Keyword | Monthly Volume | KD (ahrefs/serp data) |
|---|---|---|
| "webhook tester" | 1 600 | 21 (LOW) |
| "webhook testing" | 1 600 | 34 (borderline but OK) |
| "requestbin" | 590 | 9 |
| "webhook tester online" | 110 | 26 |
| The seed term "webhook tester" already satisfies the ≥500 vol & <30 KD rule; additional long-tails give room for SEO content. |